Guest blog *John Laity* Tax Policy….spot the Difference…& win 4 years in Power!
Posted on November 27th, 2009 in Conservatives, General Election, Guest Blog, Labour, Politics, economics | 10 Comments »

In a recent comment to Scott Newton’s guest blog, “Why Cutting Income Tax, Cutting Red Tape and Deregulating Business is essential for the UK’s Future.” I promised to write more on UK Tax Policy.
I must add that these are my personal observations and are not intended to upset anyone…
…Including Scott who’s piece is right on the mark. (Well done Scott!)
For the past 4 years my company (www.ditg.org.uk) has been funded by the worlds largest ICT brands to establish a replacement for the Government’s Home Computing Initiative (HCI).
HCI was budget measure implemented by Gordon Brown as a Tax Incentive for employees. Under Section 320 of the Finance Act, employees could acquire up to £2500 worth computer equipment from their employer Income Tax exempt. In turn, employers enjoyed an exemption on Class 1A National Insurance on the amounts salary sacrificed by the employee.
This created an industry worth £450 Million to the UK and about 2500 related employment opportunities.
Unfortunately, the exemption was removed in Budget 2006. (It was proving too successful?)
This resulted in one of the longest cross-examinations during the reading for a finance bill in recent times. (Well worth a read on Hanson – see the below link).
The Government cited “abuse” as the reason for removing the benefit and pledged to “refocus efforts on those most in need”. Check out the written evidence taken at the time:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmtreasy/994/994we14.htm
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmtreasy/994/994we08.htm
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmtreasy/994/994we06.htm
YOU MUST READ THIS NEXT ONE, IT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY HCI, BUT IS A GREAT READ.
IT ALSO SHOW THAT INSPITE OF WHAT YOU MAY THINK, WE DO RETAIN A AN OPEN AN UNBVIASED RECORD OF PUBLIC COMMENT AS PART OF UK POLITICS.
IT IS ALSO HILARIOUS:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmtreasy/994/994we07.htm
Just in case you don’t want to click off the blog – here is a taster:
“The rhetoric of “transformation”, “reform”, “investment”, “transparency”, “devolution”, “prudent”, “cautious”, “audited” and “world class” is so indulgent and self-congratulatory that one wonders if some drafters inside the Treasury are parodying ministers.”
Professor David Heald, Comments on Budget 2006
Ouch!
At the time the Conservative Party and Liberal Democrats both lobbied against the decision and the recorded debate on Hansard is a fantastic read. It is also a good introduction to political punditry and how Politician’s really debate:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/vo060502/debtext/60502-22.htm
(The unanswered question for me was always how you can abuse a taxation system that assesses individual taxation in arrears…but then I am bias and this blog isn’t about HCI!)
So with this background you would think that it would be easy to gain Parliamentary support for a refocused replacement scheme developed over 4 years at a cost to the IT Industry (not the tax payer!) of over £2.6 Million.
Not so…
In practice the differentiation between the Parties on the issue of supporting a tax incentives is in practice not all that large. (Sorry Scott)
ALL Ministers (despite what the expenses scandal suggests) are concerned as to how to pay for any incentive, will it fit with policy…
So why post this blog at all?
Well my personal concern is not about the detail of Tax Policies, nor believe it or not HCI.
My concern is the Conservative approach. Will it win us the election?
Have a look at the following comparison of Labor and Tax summary statements.

John questions whether there is enough clear blue water between Labour & Conservatives on Tax policy……you decide!
Treat yourself and see if you can spot the difference!
Conservatives:
“We will freeze council tax for two years by reducing wasteful spending on advertising and consultancy in central government.”
Labour:
“We are reducing the amount of central prescription so that local authorities and their partners are better able to respond to local needs and demands.”
Conservatives:
“We will introduce a £50bn National Loan Guarantee Scheme to underwrite bank lending to businesses and get credit flowing again.”
Labour (DirectGov):
“The government is announcing that it will offer capital and asset protection on those assets most affected by the current economic conditions. This will reduce banks’ uncertainty about the value of past investments, so providing them with greater confidence to lend in the future to creditworthy businesses, homeowners and consumers.”
Labour (Policy):
“Working with banks, Labour is providing loan guarantees to businesses to help them get the credit they need.”
Conservatives:
“We will provide tax cuts for new jobs with a £2.6bn package of tax breaks to get people into work, funded by money that would otherwise go on unemployment benefit.”
Labour:
“Extra cash to encourage employers to recruit people without jobs.”
“Stepping up the training and support people need to get back to work.”
Conservatives:
“We will cut the main rate of corporation tax to 25p and the small companies’ rate to 20p, paid for by scrapping complex reliefs and allowances”
Labour:
“Allowing businesses facing difficulties to spread their tax payments on a timetable they can afford.”
Conservatives:
“We will give small and medium-sized businesses a six-month VAT holiday, funded by a 7.5% interest rate on delayed payments.”
Labour:
“We have reduce VAT to 15%”
Conservatives:
“We will cut National Insurance by 1% for six months for firms with fewer than five employees, paid for from the above changes to the company tax regime.”
Labour:
“When it is affordable, we will re-link the basic state pension to earnings. We aim to do this by 2012 or by the end of the next parliament at the latest.”
Conservatives:
“We will abolish Stamp Duty for nine out of ten first-time buyers and raise the Inheritance Tax threshold to £1 million. Both of these changes will be funded by a flat-rate charge on non-domiciles.”
Labour:
“Extending the Stamp Duty holiday for properties under £175,000”
“Extra mortgage protection to help families stay in their homes”
“Helping savers by increasing the threshold of Individual Savings Accounts to over £10,000”
Now hopefully some clever contributors will now explain to me the differences in the comments…WAIT, some I can see! (And before you comment, I know that the Conservatives have shown how they will pay for it !!)
But you know it all does kind of sound the same to me…and taxation detail is part of my day job…
…So what hope does the deciding electorate have?
I do sincerely hope the Tory manifesto has some really clear taxation differentiators in it.
Otherwise I might get confused and vote for the wrong Party.
Here is a thought…committing to bring back s320 income tax benefits for computers would be a start.
Hey look, it is my daily bread…
John Laity…..






10 Responses
Very thought provoking blog John.
I must confess that I am worried that David Cameron has done so much work in bringing the Conservatives to the centre of British Politics, that we are indistinguishable from Labour. This blog highlights that concern.
Tell you what, if Cameron does not win their will be one hell of a s**t storm as so many are biting their tongues not wanting to rock the boat in the run up to such a pivotal election.
agree with Tory Leader.
We are now just a Party of opportunistic populists. waiting for the next soundbite or media opportunity. No conviction
I am so tired of all the bloody career politicians. I listened to one new candidate the other day. When they were introduced, the speaker detailed their background. left University, went on to be a researcher for an MP, then joined a Public Affairs Consultancy. Now a Prospective MP.
No real life experience. No common sense. Ridiculous. This candidate then started talking about the economy and how tough it is for businesses and had no clue what he was saying.
Why am I not naming them? Run up to the election, got to keep quiet.
Pure and simple.
Even in this current mess.
Not only abolish the upper rate of tax, CUT IT.
Incentivise our wealth creators, our risk takers. Let’s hit the economy with a real stimulus.
Agree with Jake the Peg! LOL. With the wonky leg!
Conservatives are tax cutters. As you say TBB, when the Tories cut tax in the severe 80’s recession, tax revenues for the Government increased.
Learn from history!
I am sure that our Manifesto would be more radical if Maggie Thatcher was in her prime and fighting this election!
very thought provoking read John. Thanks.
I like others think we need more clear blue water.
As is always said. Governments lose elections, not oppositions win them.
Now this is good news…As I was beginning to feel like I was on my own…
Here is a radical statement to fuel some more debate…I could have also included the Liberal Democrats…However, in some areas they are crystal clear on what they will do:
“We propose to raise the threshold at which people start paying income tax from current levels to £10,000, cutting the average working age person’s income tax bill by £700 and cutting pensioner’s income tax bills by £100.”
Agree or disagree…This is Crystal Clear
“Liberal Democrats will restore the link between annual increases in the state pension and earnings that will mean pensioners share in the proceeds of growth in our economy.”
Important, when the bank failures have hit elderly voters hardest.
So I have a worry that because of such clarity the LD’s will make it hard for the Conservatives to win all of the marginal seats.
Now George Osbourne is very very very good.
However, as he has nothing to loose Vince Cable often seems like a man on a mission. I love some of his simple comments:
“The Chancellor knew he was selling Lloyds a lemon but he did it anyway to save his own skin.”
I do like straight talking!
Calling Douglas Carswell and John Redwood, enter on stage right please!
Come on David, William and George, start acting like you HAVE got it in the bag and do some good-for-recovery-traditional-Tory-tax-cutting…
The Office of Tax Policy assists the Secretary in developing and implementing tax policies and programs; provides the official estimates of all Government receipts for the President’s budget, fiscal policy decisions, and Treasury cash management decisions; establishes policy criteria reflected in regulations and rulings and guides preparation of them with the Internal Revenue Service to implement and administer the Internal Revenue Code.
Regulations / legislation = Will of Parliament and Lords
Guides interpret Regulations
Code = basic quality standard (basic minimum)
Policy informs spending.
Research, report and inform…
Debate, Legislate, repeal, cut and spend…