Nigel Farage is not the only candidate standing against Speaker Bercow! Meet ‘The Independent Candidate’
Posted on October 29th, 2009 in Guest Blog, Speaker | 30 Comments »


Nigel Farage may have grabbed the headlines when he announced he was breaking centuries of Parliamentary convention and challenging Speaker Bercow for the seat of Buckingham. Much chatter has remained about the possibility of an Independent Candidate emerging to challenge them both. Independent candidates could play a big role in the next election as anger continues over MP’s expenses and with Parliament failing to sanction tough action against some of the worst offenders, fury remains in the country at large. Speaker Bercow announced this week that MP’s who ‘flipped’ their second homes to maximise their expenses or avoided paying capital gains tax will escape censure under the Official House of Commons enquiry. That means MP’s like Elliot Morley and David Chaytor who claimed thousands for ‘phantom mortgages’ have been given the all clear by Sir Thomas Legg. Oh and another ‘flipper’, John Bercow, wont be penalised…worth mentioning that!
Today’s guest blog is from Patrick Phillips, the man that both Bercow and Farage will come to hear much more from in the coming weeks and months. It goes without saying that come election results night, Buckingham will certainly be a Constituency that the media will be keeping a close eye on and reporting widely. When Patrick got in touch telling me he was standing and the reasons why, it made sense for a Guest Blog so you readers could hear his story and pass your own judgement. A story of how a Conservative voter felt he needed to take action. Over to you Patrick…….
—————————————————————
Guest Blog: Patrick Phillips
An Independent’s Story
You can imagine the scene – a mid-June, midweek, friendly supper party in a private house in a small village near Princes Risborough in Buckinghamshire. Lots of the usual chit chat but then a disgruntled voice sounds out bemoaning the fact the area in which most of those present live was going to be the subject of a boundary change at the forthcoming election. They were going to be moved from Aylesbury where their current MP was the popular and well regarded David Lidington, and become part of, as she put it, the ghastly Bercow’s flock at Buckingham. And was it true – what she had heard – that he was putting himself up for Speaker, and if he were to be elected to that office he would be re-elected unopposed at the next election, which meant that all of those present together with some further 70,000 odd electors at Buckingham would be denied a vote at the election?
“Well, yes”, said the host, “there is the convention that the major political parties in the House of Commons do not field candidates against a sitting speaker. But,” he continued, “I am pretty sure an Independent could stand and force a vote. They certainly have stood in the past”.
“But what sort of person would be prepared to do that?”, asked another, “he’d have to be mad, wouldn’t he”.
It was at that moment that either temporary madness or a rush of blood to head took over and I found myself saying, “Well if nobody else better qualified comes forward prepared to do it, I might just do so myself”.
Fast forward to Monday 22ndJune and the Speaker’s hustings in the House of Commons culminating in the 322 to 271 vote victory for John Bercow over Sir George Young. Within minutes of the result being announced the phone rang. It was my host from the supper party. “Is your money still where your mouth was”, he enquired – straight to the point. My response was equally direct. “Money and mouth are still co-located”.
And so began the current adventure to stand at Buckingham as an Independent. If any encouragement was needed it came within a couple of days when Mr Bercow was reported as saying he expected to remain as Speaker for ONLY about nine years, presumably the remainder of the current parliament and then the next two. Perhaps, I thought, he doth presume too much, and my determination hardened.
Two days later e-mailed letters were sent to various organs of the press giving them this hot story, “The Speaker’s seat will be contested” backed up by my credentials, local man, has lived forty years in the constituency, former High Sheriff of Buckinghamshire, President of local Buckinghamshire charity and so on. Result zippo! At least to begin with.
Over the next weekend I managed to make contact with a certain parliamentary sketch writer who passed on my news to the London Evening Standard who ran the story as the lead in that day’s Londoner’s Diary, and on July 1stthe Daily Mail printed my letter on their letters page. Back in Buckinghamshire I got a fair crack of the whip from the Aylesbury based “Bucks Herald” who ran profiles of myself, John Bercow, and a UKIP PPC, Dave Fowler who has subsequently been replaced by Nigel Farage. But other than this nothing.
Problem. With a constituency twenty five miles North to South and about twenty East – West containing just three towns, Buckingham, Winslow and Princes Risborough but eighty-five villages, how does an Independent, with no party machine or indeed any organisation at all to start with, spread the word of one’s candidature. Trying to get the national press (to say nothing of the BBC) to acknowledge one’s presence is like pushing with a piece of string, and just as frustrating. So we have adopted a direct grassroots approach using e-mail and the internet including now (hopefully) the blogosphere.
E-mails, and where e-mail addresses were not available, letters, have been sent to each of the constituency’s parish councils, telling them two things. Firstly about the parliamentary convention which meant that contrary to past elections there would almost certainly be no Conservative, Labour or Liberal-Democrat standing at Buckingham, and why; and secondly that I would be offering myself as a candidate (and being a fair minded bloke, that Mr. Farage would be doing so as well). Similarly I have set off a form of chain e-mail carrying the same message to private individuals.
To augment those communications a website www.phillips4buckingham.co.uk has been set up so people can get a flavour of who I am, what I believe in, and my views on some of the salient issues of the day. This is important because as an Independent, and thus not a member of any political party, one does not have the benefit of a formal manifesto with specific policies spelt out on which to stake one’s pitch. Nor is it easy to find a label by which one’s position in the left-right political spectrum can be easily identified. Electoral Law prohibits me calling myself an “Independent Conservative”, but I think anybody who has known me for any length of time would agree that I can be fairly described as “conservatively minded”. My views are of the centre-right and as regards Europe I am definitely Eurosceptic.
So what do I offer the electors of Buckingham?.
I offer myself as someone who shares their predominantly conservative views, and as a receptacle for the votes of those disillusioned with Mr Bercow and those not wishing to see UKIP establish a beachhead on this bluest of blue territory. (The memories of Orpington and how long it took to win back that seat after a by-election loss to Liberal, Eric Lubbock, all those years ago is illustrative of that danger)
I also offer a return to normality at the election after the coming one. It is not my aim to become a career politician and if elected would only expect to serve one term.
And finally, if elected, I would support a change to the Speaker’s convention that can disenfranchise a whole constituency. I would support a proposition that when a new Speaker is elected by MPs, he or she should be assigned to a nominal constituency (the name St Stephens has sometimes been mooted), and a by-election take place in his or hers old constituency. The irony of this is, of course, that if that were now to be the case, I would not be doing what I am. But this is now and that is , perhaps, for the future.
Watch this space, it could prove to be a interesting story, away from the main battlefield at the next election and the bookies have no idea how to call it.
Patrick Phillips







30 Responses
Fascinating read.
I really do sympathise and agree with what Patrick says. I am a true Conservative but Bercow has gone beyond the limits. He was close to defecting to labour. Got the Speakership only because Labour MP’s ganged together and wanted to venomously piss off the Tories.
Bercow preaches that he is the man to clean up Politics. But what are his credentials? he has ‘flipped’ his second home. Done the speakers Palace up with tax payers money. The guy is having a free ride at the expense of all of us.
Farage or Phillips. I dont care. Just not Bercow
Thanks TBB for this guest blog. quite a coup to hear from the would be assassin of Bercow
hhhhhmmmmmm. If I lived in Buckingham. Choices choices. bercow. Have to rule that one out straight away. So farage v this Independent guy. I am too loyal to the Tories to vote UKIp and dont want to support another Party. So I would definitely vote for this guy, especially as his views are very Tory and he is a Eurosceptic.
Why is there this obcession everywhere about hating Bercow. Seems a cuddly teddy to me!
Whatever you say about Bercow, he has been a fine Constituency MP for us. I have no quarrels with the man. But I was unhappy with his expenses claims though!
Susan, to answer your question.
His expenses were not clean. he ‘flipped’ his home for his own self gain.
He was not the loyalist Tory and much rumour followed him that he could defect. Whether true or not the stench was strong and followed him.
To get elected Speaker, he needed the near unanimous support of Labour MP’s. Very few, if any, Tories voted for him. Again giving credence of being a Labour stooge.
If you get to meet him, he is an arrogant man, drunk on his own grandiose ambitions.
Enough reasons?
Independent candidates could lead to a hung Parliament at the next election. i really dont think political parties, including the Tories, have come to grips with the anger felt out there. Interesting that both farage and Phillips are Eurosceptics.
Buckingham would value having Iain Dale stand. Bracknell did not want him, we would.
Farage all the way. the best public speaker we have in this country. Farage by a landslide
Interesting piece. I dont think that Cameron has been vocal enough in supporting John Bercow. The fact that both UKIP and now an Independent are standing should be laid at his silent door. If he supported Bercow and also reaffirmed in strong language that we must respect parliamentary convention, this would not have happened.
We must have a respect for our past. History is there to build for the future. The Speaker must be re-elected unopposed. Do we have no sense of history any more? A disgrace.
Thanks for publishing the story.
This guy has a mountain to climb. Will be very tough. farage will sweep in, PR guns blazing. Does Farage want to win the seat? Most likely not. He wants the fun and PR he will get.
So here we have a man that genuinely wants the chance to get elected. Strong credentials. A local, with a strong history in the area. fascinating fight.
Patrick. If I were in Buckingham, you would get my vote. then again anyone standing against that repugnant Bercow would.
Sir george Young was the best person for the job. He should be Speaker.
My favourite, Anne Widdecombe would have got it had she not decided to stand down. It was silly of her to campaign on a few months ticket!
Bercow has brought this on himself.
I wish Farage and Phillips well.
If Bercow lost, would he be the shortest ever tenant of the role of Speaker?
Whats the bookies offering for Phillips?
Might be worth a few quid bet.
What’s the betting that many of the people who applied to be a Tory candidate, some 4,000, who many have not heard back, (not a bean of communication), stand as Independent candidates.
A delicious irony there. They had the passion to apply to stand. why not as an independent. many were infuriated by the expenses scandal.
I live in Buckingham, unlike a lot of you people commenting.
Bercow is a fine MP. he has my vote.
Cut the chit chat and get on with your lives!
LOL Frankie you sound like the kind of pompus fuddy duddy that Mr Bercow would love.
Bercow has achieved NOTHING as speaker.
Promised a fresh wave of reform.
What’s he achieved. A fresh coat of paint in the Speakers Chambers. And a creche. and he has stopped wearing the silly wig and gowns. Apart from that? The man is a bloody joke.
You go Patrick.
Rid us of the curse of Bercow. Be good to see the smile wiped off his face.
But no doubt. As per the conventions he despises, if deafeated, to would be bumped up to the House of Lords
I live in the Buckingham Constituency, my wife & I are voting for NIGEL FARAGE of the UK Independence Party.
Reasons: Get rid of Bercow (a Labour MP really), he has been upto his neck in the Mp’s Expenses
Nigel Farage MEP who make one of the best MP’s in the land, he is a fantastic speaker (no pun intended) but Buckingham really need Nigel.
In a Daily Express poll, 99% of the british public want to leave the European Union, David Cameron cannot do anything while we are in the EU club, we will just get out voted by the other EU Members.
Time to leave the EU & Buckingham needs a Voice not a Speaker.
I live in the Buckingham constituency and I have followed John Bercow’s journey of ‘enlightenment’ from right of centre Conservative to trendy liberal and best buddy it seems to many New Labour chums; all whilst enjoying the security of one of the safest Conservative seats in England. In my opinion if John would have had any integrity he should have crossed the floor years ago. (I think he almost did once , but I hear he ‘bottled it’ at the last minute; perhaps realising he could lose his seat before his hidden plan to become the next Speaker was realised).
Unfortunately it seems many traditional Conservative voters in the Buckingham constituency don’t follow national politics, and therefore perhaps they don’t realise how much John Bercow has become a political chameleon, or to put it another way, a liberal/ new labour sympathiser in Conservative clothing whilst holding on to the safety of his Buckingham seat believing he is invincible. After all, he is a charming polite intelligent man and a good constituency MP; or at least was before he was elected Speaker of the House. But then Nigel Farage put his hat in the ring and people started to wonder could John Bercow’s long standing successful hidden scheme start to unravel? Imagine if the Speaker of the House lost his seat! Maybe many Conservatives, especially Euro sceptics might switch to UKIP, but then there are many true blue conservatives who wouldn’t feel comfortable voting for another liberal and giving UKIP a foothold in Parliament. Surely there had to be an alternative? Perhaps a ‘Independent real conservative’ who was well known in the County of Buckinghamshire.
It seems the prayers of many natural Conservatives voters have been answered with the news that the ex- High Sheriff of Buckinghamshire, Patrick Phillips is going to stand for the Buckingham seat. A man who has the respect of many. To those who know him, he is a thoroughly decent chap with many years experience in public service and he will be standing as an Independent Candidate. As he states in a recent statement on the right of centre political blog, ‘TrueBlueBlood’. ‘Electoral law prohibits him calling himself an Independent conservative’. Well from what I know of Patrick he holds traditional conservative values unlike John Bercow or Nigel Farage who it seems are both proud of their liberal values. At least traditional conservatives now have a candidate who shares their own values; so it seems Buckingham constituency will have a ‘true blue’ candidate after all. I believe if Patrick gets his message across to the Buckingham electorate he stands a very good chance of being elected. So both Mr Bercow and Mr Farage better not count there chickens just yet, as the ‘true blue’ Buckingham constituency might support the only ‘true blue’ candidate en masse!
What Message is Simon talking about!!
Patrick Phillips’ letter to last week’s Bucks Herald, reaffirming the intention to stand against John Bercow in the general election, was less clear about his actual political affiliations than his website and his contributions to many Tory blog sites this one among them. He is simply an alternative Conservative candidate. His writings on the web make clear that whilst he calls himself an independent he only does this because he thinks he is not allowed to call himself a Conservative. It is an artifice; an attempt not just to sidestep the constitutional convention, which Mr Phillips fully acknowledges, namely that the main opposition parties do not field candidates against the Speaker, but an attempt to drive a coach and horses through convention by opposing the Speaker on behalf of the Speaker’s own party! A breathtaking constitutional breach.
The justification put forward in his letter for his candidacy was both confused and confusing. The Speaker must be a sitting member of the House of Commons but upon becoming Speaker his party political career is effectively at an end. There are very few instances, none in modern times, of any Speaker resuming a party political career after ceasing to be Speaker. The need for the Speaker to maintain his or her impartiality, effectively precludes party political campaigning in general elections on National Policy issues and that is precisely why he should be free of challenge by National Parties or those who, de facto, belong to National Parties but by subterfuge put themselves up under the pretence of another name. As the Speaker is effectively precluded from campaigning on his own party’s manifesto, it is self evidently dishonourable for another person of the same party to campaign against him.
Mr Phillips’ makes a poor attempt to rationalise the breach of convention he contemplates by suggesting on this blog (but wisely not in his letter to the newspaper) that, upon election the Speaker would be assigned to a fictional seat and that his actual seat would then be subject to a further election. This is bizarre. Walter Bagehot will have turned in his grave and, anyone living, with a passing interest in the British Constitution, choked on their cornflakes at this suggestion. It is obviously crucial to the Speaker’s position that he is elected and is answerable to his constituents (and these days his constituency party) when he is called upon to exercise a vote.
The Speaker votes if there is a tie, and this has happened in recent times. When it does occur it is as often as not on a major issue of controversy or national importance. To place the casting vote, as Mr Phillips suggests, on matters of national importance in the hands of a person who is not answerable to any constituents is anti-democratic and against the fundamental tenets of the very British Parliamentary democracy that Mr Phillips says he is so keen to defend against the “Barbarians at the gate ” in Brussels.
The words Mr Phillips put into John Bercow’s mouth of a speakership of about 9 years is actually a fairly common period for recent Tory Speakers. Bernard Weatherill and Betty Boothroyd being 9 years and 8 years respectively, but way below two other Tory Speakers of the 20th century, James Lowther at 16 years and Edward Fitzroy at 15 years. Other recent well regarded Tory Speakers, like Selwyn Lloyd, was in office over two parliaments and finished after 6 years only through ill health.
For a professed Conservative, Mr Phillips’ letter and the candidacy which he sought to publicise, portrayed a startling lack of knowledge or understanding about the pivotal position of the Speaker’s office and why conventions developed so that the office was not undermined. It is difficult to conclude other than the actual reason why Mr Phillips (who does not seem to have any particular qualification to offer himself as a member of parliament-old men with two houses who have occupied a a ceremonial office that confers a frilly shirt and 18 century costume doesn’t cut much mustard in this neck of the woods) is seeking election is out of personal animus against Mr Bercow. This too is worrying. John Bercow was selected by a vote of MPs as the best person to fulfil the job. Accepting the democratic decisions of Parliament is a virtue practised by true Conservatives. Mr Phillips however appears to be happy to throw this aside. Not accepting decisions of the House of Commons is a worrying trait in a prospective parliamentary candidate and Mr Phillips might be well advised to reflect on that at the same time as brushing up on his Bagehot before he goes any further with his candidacy.
Genuine non national party candidates are however quite entitled to stand. The Speaker, on constituency matters, is able to act and campaign as any other MP or prospective MP. Mr Phillips’ assertion that Buckinghamshire’s electorate had been disenfranchised by John Bercow assuming the office of Speaker is therefore plainly wrong.
What matters in Buckingham’s forthcoming poll is who is going to do the best job for the issues that face Buckingham. Most voters (even apparently Simon)have a very clear idea of John Bercow’s strengths as a constituency MP. By contrast, there was nothing in Mr Phillips’ letter and there is nothing on the Phillips4Buckingham website about any constituency issue at all. Unless Mr Phillips can persuade the many who think John Bercow has done a good job as a constituency MP that he, Phillips is genuinely independent and has got something to say about local politics he, like the parachuting Mr Farage does not have much of anything to offer .
Since I was very graciously allowed the opportunity to bring my candidature at Buckingham to a wider audience through my guest blog, I feel I would be doing readers of it a disservice if I failed to respond to points made by Richard Howard above. Sorry if this seems nit-picky but he needs to be put right on a number of items.
Paragraph 1: He claims that I am “simply an alternative Conservative candidate”, that my Independent candidature “is an artifice”, and “an attempt to drive a coach and horses through convention by opposing the Speaker on behalf of the Speaker’s own party”. Nothing could be further than the truth. I am an Independent as I am not a member of any political party. No party is supporting my candidature in any way. I am running my own campaign on my own with my own money with the help of family and friends and, I hope, in due course, a band of volunteer helpers. I am not running it on behalf anybody else. Yes, I have conservative views. I have been a Conservative voter in the past and am quite likely to be one again in the future, but that does not compromise my independence. If I am elected I shall not take the Conservative whip in the House of Commons. Yes, in all probability I shall find myself most often giving my support to what I hope and expect to be a Conservative government, but when I do so I shall be making my own independent voting decisions based on my own judgments..
End of paragragh 2. Mr Howard writes “….it is self evidently dishonourable for another person (by implication, me) of the same party to campaign against him (theSpeaker)”. Well, yes it would be if that were the case but it isn’t. As Mr. Howard should know Speakers break all ties with their political parties upon election to that office. Thus Mr. Bercow who was previously a member of the Conservative party but is no longer, and I have not been one since the early 1970s.
Paragraph 3. Mr Howard may be unaware that some discussion of introducing a system by which in future a Speaker would be assigned to a notional constituency and a by-election called in his original constituency has already taken place, and Buckingham Liberal-Democrats went so far as to submit a motion to the Lib-Dem Autumn Conference calling for the current system to be reformed. And again, Mr. Howard you show your misunderstanding of the Speaker’s non-party status when you talk about him being answerable to “and in these days, to his constituency party”. He has no party.
I could go on but will end by rebutting the content of Mr. Howard’s penultimate paragraph where he states that the Speaker on constituency matters is perfectly capable of acting as any other MP, and that my assertion that by his becoming Speaker (unless opposed) the Buckingham electorate would be disenfranchised. Yes, the Speaker is capable of representing the electorate, but there is a difference between the electorate being unrepresented and disenfranchised. Being disenfranchised means being denied the opportunity to exercise one’s right to vote for who should represent you; which is precisely what would have happened at the next General Election if nobody had been prepared to come forward and contest the seat. A different matter altogther.
Nigel Farage of UKIP all the way folks, time to make HISTORY by getting rid of John Bercow MP (The Speaker) who will be the shortest ! surving speaker of the House of Commons.
“I cannot remember if I paid capital gains tax” John Bercow !
VOTE UKIP, VOTE NIGEL FARAGE
This “independent” is a bigoted old fart who detests gays and feminists; it’s even on his website. Other than that, he seems to agree with UKIP on everything
Vote Farage – the libertarian option. A man who doesn’t give a rat’s arse about “family values” and who-marries-who but focuses on the truly pressing issues. A man who knows economics, a man with extensive political experience across the continent, a man with a view to bringing back proper education in the UK. Farage will be a credit to Bucks!
If the best riposte this old fart can come up with is “This is true blue territory”, it shows how horribly out-of-touch he is with the political situation in the UK. All bets are off for the two-party system. People want a candidate who represents them, not just a silly rosette!
When you’re in uncomfortable position and have no money to get out from that, you would require to take the mortgage loans. Because it will help you for sure. I take commercial loan every single year and feel fine because of it.
Do not money to buy a car? Worry no more, just because this is possible to receive the personal loans to solve such kind of problems. Therefore take a car loan to buy all you require.